The concept of miracle has long been a subject of discussion and interest for philosophers, theologians, and even natural scientists. In the Islamic world, two prominent ontological models are the Ash'arite phenomenalist model and the philosophical rationalist model. The former analyzes miracles based on the "theory of divine habit," while the latter does so based on "rational philosophical principles." Since the seventeenth century, the West has witnessed the emergence of various scientific ontological models, which have drawn the attention of both Islamic and Western philosophers and theologians. These thinkers have endeavored to formulate their positions concerning the logical implications of these ontological models for analyzing miracles. This article first aims to descriptively explain various ontological models. Then, employing an analytical and comparative approach, it compares the philosophical ontological model with that of modern science. Ultimately, it investigates whether an ontological model grounded in a causal system can provide a reasonable interpretation of miracles—one that necessitates neither a violation of rational laws nor a breach of natural laws.